You might find him exploring various cuisines at local cafes and restaurants or immersing himself in thought-provoking audio books. He is the driving force behind, a vibrant platform that unites accessibility professionals, developers, and enthusiasts, propelling the adoption of accessible practices.īeyond the digital realm, Raghavendra seeks diverse experiences. Passionate about fostering change within the tech landscape, Raghavendra actively inspires local tech communities through engaging meetups and mentorship. Raghavendra is the author behind the influential Accessibility Blog hosted at, where he delves into the intricate realm of digital accessibility and its significance. Through his impactful work, he collaborates with both small businesses and large enterprises, spearheading digital transformation initiatives. Raghavendra Satish Peri empowers enterprises with his expertise in digital accessibility and marketing. Internet Explorer has been phased out and Edge browser has taken its place. Note: This article has been updated in 2023 to include the latest results from the WebAIM Screen Reader Survey. Hope this is helpful! Any views & opinions can be shared in comments section. If something doesn’t work, then cross testing on a different browser/platform can determine if it is a browser or screen reader bug. Most of the HTML5 & WAI-ARIA attributes are supported on all these platforms. If you have written a clean code that is semantic & follows all W3C Standards then testing on these platforms will suffice. So let’s answer the question, which screen reader should I use for accessibility testing? In my opinion & my experience, this is the matrix that I have come up with and now for your view: Secondly, testing with all browsers VS screen readers is a costly affair as it consumes a lot of resources, time and money too. Not every attribute is supported by all the screen readers. The same is true when we talk of the screen readers too. Firstly, the support for HTML attributes and ARIA attributes by the browser vendors vary a lot. WebAIM Survey Responses for Most Common Browser and Screen Reader Combinations.Īt my work place we follow testing on Chrome with NVDA screen reader & if we encounter any bugs related to either screen reader or the browser, we immediately raise the bugs with the vendor.īesides, there are other factors too that attribute to the AT testing conundrum. During my day to day accessibility testing I use NVDA with Chrome & sometimes I also use NVDA with Firefox to see if any ARIA or HTML5 attribute is not being supported by the browser or the screen reader. I personally prefer JAWS with Chrome and JAWS with Firefox. WebAIM Survey Responses for Browser used most often with Primary Screen Reader.Īccording to WebAIM Screen reader survey we can clearly see from the below table that JAWS works great on Chrome followed by NVDA with Chrome. When it comes to IOS & OSx Safari is the most popular browser and on Android, Chrome holds a good position. Definitely assistive technology users prefer Chrome and Edge over Firefox for their day to day activities. According to WebAIM screen reader survey9 conducted in 2021, Chrome stands first followed by Microsoft Edge & in 3rd place is Firefox. These stats are true for both desktop & mobile. Popular BrowsersĪccording to Wikipedia, Chrome holds the majority share for the browser market followed by Safari. Testing with every screen reader on every browser is not feasible if not impossible. Whenever I say that I make web & mobile Apps accessible for the disability groups, the first question some of the educated developers who understand accessibility ask me is, what browsers you test your APP’s on & which screen readers do you use? This is a very interesting question because, there are a wide variety of browsers & screen readers that are available in the market.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |